University with Potential for Excellence Scheme
The vastly changed media scenario calls for a recasting of the role of media in promoting pro social change. The economic reform has resulted in the democratization of media facilitating local governance as a stepping stone for empowerment of communities facilitating social development. Media convergence has the immense potential to create media, i.e. media with concern for development to provide alternative to commercial mainstream media. Today there are several initiates to provide alternative media tools to realize the goals of development.
Today the unique concept of interactive communication technology can overcome the technological obsolescence as it is compatible for media convergence. It has the potential to become a unique tool for imparting continuing education and training with greater degree of flexibility.
The study is based on following premises:
There are four important premises in which Media’s
interface with social development has been much debated. First important premise
is that sensitized media would make the State to respond to the larger problems
afflicting society. Amartya Sen in his study on famine once argued that the famine
although is “man made”, can be contained when media become over cautious about the
issues. This is very apparent in the context of Karnataka too. Coastal Karnataka
for example has not seen famine in its history as it is one region known for literacy
, human development as well as higher exposure to print media. Wherever the media
has not intervened, the social development remained marginal Second premise is that
social development across the region is not uniform. It differs with each region.
The development paradigm has given rise to multiple “mini India” within India. Similarly
there are multiple Karnataka – social development of categories in each region differ
from other one, depending upon the accessibility, level of economic development
etc Third premise is that the same indices cannot be universally applied given the
fact that cultural specifities about the social categories require different indexes.
This is the reason why social development of dalits, minorities, women require different
indices. Fourth premise is that we can create a new “Karnataka Model of Social Development”
on line with Kerala Model of Development. In the absence of heavy industrial and
agricultural developments Kerala has created greater social spaces than other States.
Karnataka is one of the 8th largest state in India in terms of population. It has a population of 61.1 million with 31.05 million males (50.05%) and 30.07 million females (49.11%). It has the sex ratio of M-1000 and F-964. The literacy rate has gone up at 67.04% with Males -76.29% and Females – 57.45%. The state has 30 districts, 176 taluks and 27028 revenue villages. The state’s Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) is expected to reach a growth of 8.2% (2010-11) as against 5.2% in 2009-10. The state’s growth rate which was always higher than the national average growth rate till 2007-08 is well below the national GDP growth rate of 8.6% in 2010-11.
Karnataka has 56,682 rural habitations including 27,017 Revenue villages. According to 2011 census, about 66.01% of its people live in rural habitations. 69% of the State's population and about 62 lakhs households who live in the rural areas depend mainly on agriculture. The distinguishing features of the State's rural society are;
Copyright © 2014 - All Rights Reserved - UGC UPE FOCUS AREA - II
Designed and Developed By Galaxy Ads